| Title |
Predictors of dementia misclassification when using brief cognitive assessments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology: Clinical Practice, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000566 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janice M Ranson, Elżbieta Kuźma, William Hamilton, Graciela Muniz-Terrera, Kenneth M Langa, David J Llewellyn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 24% |
| United States | 23 | 18% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 58% |
| Scientists | 31 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 16% |
| Psychology | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#210,832
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Neurology: Clinical Practice
#13
of 1,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,422
of 365,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology: Clinical Practice
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.